首页良性前列腺增生治疗及预后证据详情

Serenoa repens and its effects on male sexual function. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

原文:2021年 发布于 Arch Ital Urol Androl 93卷 第4期 475-480 浏览量:851次 原文链接

作者: Paulis G. Paulis A. Perletti G.

作者单位: Department of Uro-Andrology, Castelfidardo Medical Team, Rome. paulisg@libero.it. Neurosystem Center for applied Psychology and Neuroscience, Janet Clinical Centre, Rome. andrea.fx94@gmail.com. Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Section of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese. gianpaolo.perletti@uninsubria.it.

归属分类: 良性前列腺增生治疗及预后证据

DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.4.475

关键词: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors Androgen Antagonists Humans Male Plant Extracts/*pharmacology *Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic *Serenoa/chemistry Tamsulosin

文献简介

BACKGROUND: Serenoa repens (SR) is a plant used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. We know that SR act as a 5α-reductase inhibitor, moreover, several studies have proved that SR has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. There is some belief among patients that SR may negatively impact male sexual function. Such belief is circulating in non-medical social networks and is perhaps maintained by patients as a result of incorrect web surfing. However, it is also possible that SR may exert a "nocebo" effect thus negatively impacting on the general well-being of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate whether SR is causing negative effects on male sexual function. METHODS: To ascertain the effect of SR on male sexual function, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, by performing an electronic database search in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 20 included papers, 8 papers reported comparisons of SR with placebo, and 7 studies reported comparisons of SR with tamsulosin. The standardized mean difference of changes from baseline scores of sexual function was not significantly different between SR and placebo (SMD: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.05; I^2 = 95%). Similarly, no significant mean differences in the Male Sexual Function-4 (MSF-4) test scores were found between SR and tamsulosin (SMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -0.82 to 0.19; I^2 = 90%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant differences between negative effects on sexual function in patients treated with SR compared to patients who received placebo. The results of our meta-analysis are similar to those of other systematic reviews. Studies are warranted to ascertain whether any such effects might occur as a result of a nocebo effect.

热门文献