首页良性前列腺增生治疗及预后证据详情

Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate vs Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate in the Treatment of Moderate-Large Volume Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

原文:2021年 发布于 J Endourol 35卷 第5期 663-673 浏览量:1554次 原文链接

作者: Bruce A. Krishan A. Sadiq S. Ehsanullah S. A. Khashaba S.

作者单位: Department of Urology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Department of Urology, Dudley Group Foundation NHS Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom. Department of Urology, King Hamad University Hospital, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain.

归属分类: 良性前列腺增生治疗及预后证据

DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0840

关键词: Humans Male *Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery *Transurethral Resection of Prostate Treatment Outcome Urologic Surgical Procedures *benign prostatic hyperplasia *bipolar *monopolar *transurethral resection of the prostate

文献简介

Aims: To compare outcomes of monopolar vs bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the management of exclusively moderate-large volume prostatic hyperplasia in terms of maximum flow rate as a surrogate for clinical efficacy, duration of catheterization, hospital stay, operative time, resection weight, transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, acute urinary retention (AUR), clot retention, and blood transfusion. Methods: We conducted a search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL), identifying studies comparing the outcomes of monopolar and bipolar TURP in the management of large-volume prostatic hyperplasia. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies were used to assess included studies. Random effects modeling was used to calculate pooled outcome data. Results: Three RCTs and four observational studies were identified, enrolling 496 patients. No difference was observed in the clinical efficacy between each procedure at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.99), 6 months (p = 0.46), and 12 months (p = 0.29). The use of bipolar TURP was associated with significantly shorter inpatient stay (p = 0.01) and a shorter duration of catheterization (p = 0.05). Monopolar TURP was associated with an increased risk of TUR syndrome (p = 0.03). Operative time (p = 0.58), resection weight (p = 0.16), AUR (p = 0.96), clot retention (p = 0.79), and blood transfusion (p = 0.39) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that bipolar TURP in the treatment of moderate-large volume prostatic disease may be associated with a significantly lower rate of TUR syndrome and shortened length of hospital stay, with similar efficacy when compared with monopolar TURP. Further high-quality RCTs with adequate sample sizes are required to compare both monopolar and bipolar TURP to open prostatectomy or laser enucleation in the treatment of exclusively large-volume prostates with stricter definition of size.

热门文献