首页膀胱肿瘤治疗及预后证据详情

经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中腹股沟入路和传统耻骨入路行闭孔神经阻滞的有效性和安全性的 Meta 分析

原文: 2021 年 发布于 Transl Androl Urol 39 卷 第 9 期 2737-2749 浏览量:286次

作者: 邱超 冯德超 刘圣琢 杨玉帛 白云金 韩平 魏武然

作者单位: a Division of Urology , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina b Research and Education Services, Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , USA c Academic Medical Centre , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.

归属分类: 膀胱肿瘤治疗及预后证据

DOI: 10.19300/j.2018.r0209

关键词: Aged Aged 80 and over Female Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence Local/*therapy Rhabdomyosarcoma/mortality/*therapy Survival Analysis Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality/*therapy Adult Bladder Rhabdomyosarcoma

文献简介

Background Due to the poor prognosis, the treatment of high-risk bladder cancer (HRBC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to access the efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IC) versus IC alone after bladder-sparing surgery in HRBC. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE (until June 2020) was conducted. PRISMA checklist was followed. The data were analyzed by RevMan v5.3.0. Results A total of five articles including 843 patients were studied. The analysis demonstrated that the IAC + IC group had a greater improvement of overall survival (P = 0.02) and significant reduction in terms of tumor recurrence rate (P = 0.0006) and tumor progression rate (P = 0.008) compared with the IC group. The recurrence-free survival in the IAC + IC group was significantly higher than that in the IC group (P = 0.004), but there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.32). In addition, the combination of IAC and IC significantly extended tumor recurrence interval (P = 0.0001) and reduced tumor-specific death rate (P = 0.01) for patients with HRBC compared with IC alone. For side effects related with IAC, although about half of the patients experienced some toxicities, most of them were mild and reversible (grades 1-2, 22.3% vs. grade 3-4, 2.7%), mainly including nausea/vomiting (P = 0.0001), neutropenia (P = 0.002), and alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.0001). Conclusion Patients with HRBC treated with IAC + IC after bladder-sparing surgery had a marked improvement in the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, time interval to first recurrence, tumor recurrence rate, tumor progression rate, and tumor-specific death rate than patients treated with IC alone. However, progression-free survival was not significantly correlated with treatment strategy. In addition, patients seemed to tolerate well the toxicities related with IAC. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021232679.

热门文献