PURPOSE: Ureteral stenting in patients with bladder cancer may become necessary in order to protect the ureteral orifice during transurethral resection of the tumor or for relief of upper urinary tract obstruction. However, it is believed to increase metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ureteral stenting versus nephrostomy or no drainage with regard to the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Records were identified through database searches and sources of grey literature up to October 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020178298). RESULTS: Five studies (3,309 individuals) were included. Overall, 278 ureteral stents were placed and 20 (7.2%) patients developed metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma, while 131 patients were treated with nephrostomy and 3 (2.3%) cases of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma occurred. Patients treated with ureteral stents had a higher likelihood of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared to no stents (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.43-8.48, I(2)=52%) and no upper urinary tract drainage (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.49-7.63, I(2)=45%). No difference with regard to metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma was observed between stent and nephrostomy (OR: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.41-22.98, I(2)=54%). For the same outcomes, no difference was noted for patients with hydronephrosis. The level of evidence for all measures was evaluated as low. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting as a preventive measure after resection of tumors involving the orifice should be avoided, when possible, as it increases the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In cases of hydronephrosis, drainage with either nephrostomy or stent is recommended depending on individual patient cases as both interventions do not differ regarding metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk.